<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is HFCS Evil as Some Nutritionists Claim?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://themommaven.com/is-hfcs-evil-as-some-nutritionists-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://themommaven.com/is-hfcs-evil-as-some-nutritionists-claim/</link>
	<description>Tales, Tastes &#38; Travels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cynthia1770		</title>
		<link>https://themommaven.com/is-hfcs-evil-as-some-nutritionists-claim/#comment-8523</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia1770]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themommaven.com/?p=3633#comment-8523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
I don&#039;t quite know how to write this without sounding patronizing or
condescending, but I find the CRA&#039;s strategy, to use mombloggers to
help them sell HFCS, rather desperate. 
I have been doing research on HFCS for the last three years. 
The problem with talking about HFCS is that it is not just one syrup.
According to Archer-Daniels-Midland, producer of HFCS, they make
three
Cornsweet 42,
Conrsweet 55, used for soda
Cornsweet 90, intensely sweet, used for low-cal foods and beverages.
The numbers reflect the percentage of fructose in the sweetener.
Therefore Cornsweet 90 is 90% fructose. This challenges the CRA&#039;s
statement that HFCS is not &quot;high&quot; in fructose, when one of their
products surely is high in fructose compared to table sugar, sucrose, which has 50% fructose. 
I will understand that you might not want to post my comment.
But, please, for your and your family&#039;s sake, try avoiding HFCS
as much as you can, especially all national brands of soda which
are sweetened with HFCS-55. In every American Coke there is, compared to glucose, 22% more fructose. 
Take care,
Cynthia Papierniak, M.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I don&#8217;t quite know how to write this without sounding patronizing or<br />
condescending, but I find the CRA&#8217;s strategy, to use mombloggers to<br />
help them sell HFCS, rather desperate.<br />
I have been doing research on HFCS for the last three years.<br />
The problem with talking about HFCS is that it is not just one syrup.<br />
According to Archer-Daniels-Midland, producer of HFCS, they make<br />
three<br />
Cornsweet 42,<br />
Conrsweet 55, used for soda<br />
Cornsweet 90, intensely sweet, used for low-cal foods and beverages.<br />
The numbers reflect the percentage of fructose in the sweetener.<br />
Therefore Cornsweet 90 is 90% fructose. This challenges the CRA&#8217;s<br />
statement that HFCS is not &#8220;high&#8221; in fructose, when one of their<br />
products surely is high in fructose compared to table sugar, sucrose, which has 50% fructose.<br />
I will understand that you might not want to post my comment.<br />
But, please, for your and your family&#8217;s sake, try avoiding HFCS<br />
as much as you can, especially all national brands of soda which<br />
are sweetened with HFCS-55. In every American Coke there is, compared to glucose, 22% more fructose.<br />
Take care,<br />
Cynthia Papierniak, M.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
